Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro: Specs, Price, Pros & Cons
The Qrevo 2 Pro's headline feature is one most robots at its price do not have: it takes the mop off. Before moving onto carpet the robot returns to the dock, drops the entire mopping module, cleans the carpet dry, then collects the mop again afterwards. Lifting pads 15 mm above a rug keeps them out of the fibers, but removing them entirely is the only method that guarantees high-pile carpet never gets damp. Roborock notes the behavior has to be switched on in the app.
Suction is 20,000 Pa on the North American version, and that qualifier matters: Roborock's global site advertises the same model at 25,000 Pa with a hotter wash. The figures on this page are the ones US and Canadian buyers are given.
The brushes are new. The DuoDivide main brush runs two arms of mixed rubber and bristle at slightly different speeds so hair is cut in the gap between them instead of winding around the roller, and the side brush reverses its spin inside corners, which Roborock claims is worth about 30 percent more corner coverage. Mopping is by a pair of spinning pads on an arm that extends to within 1.85 mm of the skirting.
Navigation is a PreciSense LiDAR turret, so mapping does not depend on light. Obstacle avoidance, though, is structured light only: there is no camera and no object recognition, which is the clearest difference from Roborock's more expensive machines and much of the reason this one costs less.
The dock washes the mop at up to 65 degrees, dries it with warm air at 45 degrees and 45 decibels, refills the robot's tank, empties into a sealed bag Roborock says lasts about 65 days, and adds a four-minute soak for dried-on stains.
What Roborock does not publish for this model is unusually broad: no battery capacity, no runtime, no bin or tank volumes, and no threshold-climbing figure of any kind.
Category strengths
Where the Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro beats the median
- Has automatic mop removal ?
- A higher mop lift ?15 mm vs 10.5 mm (median)
- Slightly stronger suction ?20,000 Pa vs 19,750 Pa (median)
Where the Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro trails the median
- A lower mop wash temperature ?65 °C vs 75 °C (median)
- A slightly lower warm-air drying temperature ?45 °C vs 50 °C (median)
How this VS Score was computed
Score 65: each known spec is measured against the median of all robot vacuums (58 products), then weighted; 50 means level with that median. In classes of six or more, a value beyond the class’s 10th–90th percentile range counts as that limit, so one extreme product cannot set the scale. 30% of the scoreable weight could be used; unknown values, features not applicable to this class and proxies (battery capacity where a rated life exists) add or remove nothing.
| Specification | This product | Cohort median | Score weight | Points moved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mopping | Yes | 79% of the class have it | 0.6 | +30.0 |
| Edge-cleaning extension | Yes | 79% of the class have it | 0.4 | +20.0 |
| Automatic mop removal | Yes | 34% of the class have it | 0.4 | +20.0 |
| Mop lift | 15 | 10.5 | 0.3 | +6.3 |
| Mop wash temperature | 65 | 75 | 0.3 | −2.1 |
| Suction power | 20,000 | 19,750 | 1.2 | +1.2 |
| Warm-air drying temperature | 45 | 50 | 0.2 | −1.0 |
| Navigation | LiDAR | LiDAR | 1 | +0.0 |
| Height | 96.6 | 96.8 | 0.5 | +0.0 |
Not scored: Carpet detection (standard for the class (98% have it)); Cleaning modes (unknown: not scored); Max cleaning area (unknown: not scored); Mapping (standard for the class (98% have it)); Multi-floor maps (unknown: not scored); Obstacle avoidance (standard for the class (100% have it)); No-go zones (standard for the class (100% have it)); Threshold clearance (unknown: not scored); Battery capacity (unknown: not scored); Runtime (unknown: not scored); Recharge & resume (unknown: not scored); Self-empty dock (standard for the class (91% have it)); Auto-refill mop (standard for the class (87% have it)); Mop self-cleaning (standard for the class (92% have it)); Automatic detergent dispenser (unknown: not scored); Dirt detection & re-mop (unknown: not scored); Dock clean-water tank (unknown: not scored); Dustbin capacity (unknown: not scored); Water tank (unknown: not scored); Noise level (unknown: not scored); App control (standard for the class (100% have it)); Voice assistant (standard for the class (100% have it)); Scheduling (standard for the class (100% have it)); Zone / room cleaning (standard for the class (100% have it)); HEPA filter (unknown: not scored).
Editor’s note
I would put the Qrevo 2 Pro in front of anyone whose home is half hard floor and half carpet, because that is the problem auto mop removal solves. Every mopping robot claims to handle mixed floors, and most do it by lifting the pads a centimeter and hoping. Taking the module off at the dock is the version that works, and until recently it was a flagship-only feature.
Turn it on first. Roborock ships the behavior disabled, so as delivered the machine does what every other robot does, and the reason you bought it sits unused in a menu.
The gap to understand before buying is obstacle avoidance. Structured light sees shapes but does not recognize them, so this robot will route around a shoe without knowing whether it is a cable, a sock or a pet accident. On floors tidied before each run, that is fine. A lived-in floor is where the models with cameras earn their extra cost.
Two smaller notes. The suction rating differs by region (the North American unit is rated below the global one), so a review quoting the higher number may not describe the machine you receive. And Roborock publishes no runtime, battery or bin capacity for this model, and its own product page currently links the wrong user manual, so several rows here are empty because the information has not been published anywhere we looked.
Against the Qrevo Curv 2 Flow, this is the drier-carpet option and that one is the better mopper, with a self-washing roller and a hotter dock. Against the Qrevo Master, you trade camera obstacle recognition for double the suction and the removable mop.
Specifications
Quality bars show where each figure sits between the lowest and highest of the 58 robot vacuums this VS Score is measured against.
Cleaning
Navigation
Battery & dock
Design
Smart features
Maintenance & filtration
Sources and verification
Where the specifications come from
- Official product pageus.roborock.com
Verification
- First published
- Specifications last checked
- Sheet completeness
- 25 of 42 specifications verified; the rest show as Unknown and are never estimated or scored
- Page type
- Product specification page — Compiled from the manufacturer’s published specifications and the cited sources; this is not a hands-on test.
- Basis
- Research-based: specifications and editorial text were compiled from the documents listed here and the manufacturer’s published data. We have not tested this unit ourselves; where independent measurements are mentioned they belong to the linked publication.
Where to buy
Prices and availability may change. Check the retailer before buying. We may earn a commission on purchases.
Price history
Robot Vacuums with similar specs to the Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro
Ratings & reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.
The bottom line
The Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro earns a VS Score of 65 on the 30% of specifications we could compare like for like — an indication, not a ranking.
- Who it’s for
- Homes split between hard floor and carpet that want the mop physically removed before carpet cleaning, not merely lifted, without paying flagship money.
- Who should look elsewhere
- Lived-in floors with cables, socks and pet messes, since obstacle avoidance is structured light only, with no camera and no object recognition.
- The trade-off that matters
- Auto mop removal and strong anti-tangle brushes at a mid-range price, against no camera, a regionally lower suction rating, and a spec sheet Roborock has barely filled in.
- The main alternative
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow is the better mopper if carpet is rare: a self-washing roller mop with a hotter dock, at the cost of the removable module.
The VS Score is calculated from the weighted specifications above, each measured against the median of comparable robot vacuums — a shortlisting guide, not a substitute for your own priorities. See how we score.
