Discover smart buying decisions with Better Buy Base. We provide clear comparisons, pros and cons, and tailored recommendations for every budget and need.
Best Monitors
Our pick of the best monitors, ranked by VS Score from 102 we compared.
ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG
Top pickOur top pick — the highest VS Score in the category.
- A much higher refresh rate ?480 Hz vs 213.58 Hz (avg)
- A much faster response time ?0.03 ms vs 1.46 ms (avg)
- Much higher peak brightness ?1,300 nits vs 677.45 nits (avg)
71Points
A close runner-up and a strong all-round choice.
- A much higher refresh rate ?330 Hz vs 213.58 Hz (avg)
- A much higher pixel density ?218 ppi vs 123.24 ppi (avg)
- Much higher peak brightness ?1,000 nits vs 677.45 nits (avg)
68Points
A close runner-up and a strong all-round choice.
- A much higher contrast ratio ?1500000:1 vs 499721:1 (avg)
- A much faster response time ?0.03 ms vs 1.46 ms (avg)
- Much higher peak brightness ?1,000 nits vs 677.45 nits (avg)
68Points
A solid alternative worth a look.
- A much higher contrast ratio ?1500000:1 vs 499721:1 (avg)
- A much faster response time ?0.1 ms vs 1.46 ms (avg)
- Much higher peak brightness ?1,000 nits vs 677.45 nits (avg)
67Points
A solid alternative worth a look.
- A much higher contrast ratio ?1500000:1 vs 499721:1 (avg)
- A much faster response time ?0.03 ms vs 1.46 ms (avg)
- Much higher peak brightness ?1,000 nits vs 677.45 nits (avg)
67Points
A solid alternative worth a look.
- A much higher contrast ratio ?1500000:1 vs 499721:1 (avg)
- A much faster response time ?0.03 ms vs 1.46 ms (avg)
- Much higher peak brightness ?1,300 nits vs 677.45 nits (avg)
67Points
A solid alternative worth a look.
- A much higher refresh rate ?540 Hz vs 213.58 Hz (avg)
- A much higher contrast ratio ?1500000:1 vs 499721:1 (avg)
- Much higher peak brightness ?1,500 nits vs 677.45 nits (avg)
66Points
A solid alternative worth a look.
- A much higher contrast ratio ?1500000:1 vs 499721:1 (avg)
- A much higher refresh rate ?360 Hz vs 213.58 Hz (avg)
- A much faster response time ?0.03 ms vs 1.46 ms (avg)
66Points
A solid alternative worth a look.
- A much higher refresh rate ?540 Hz vs 213.58 Hz (avg)
- A much higher contrast ratio ?1500000:1 vs 499721:1 (avg)
- A much faster response time ?0.02 ms vs 1.46 ms (avg)
66Points
A solid alternative worth a look.
- A much higher contrast ratio ?1850000:1 vs 499721:1 (avg)
- Much higher peak brightness ?1,500 nits vs 677.45 nits (avg)
- A much faster response time ?0.03 ms vs 1.46 ms (avg)
66Points
Popular comparisons
Dell Alienware AW3225QF vs Dell Alienware AW3225DMDell S2725DC vs Dell S2725QCAOC Q27G3XMN vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3KOORUI S2741LM vs Acer Nitro XV275K P5biipruzxASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM vs ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG vs KOORUI S2741LMDell Alienware AW3225QF vs Dell Alienware AW3225DM vs Dell Alienware AW3425DW