Roborock Qrevo Pro: Specs, Price, Pros & Cons
An arm that swings out from the side of the robot toward the baseboard is what the Qrevo Pro adds to the Qrevo platform, and Roborock calls it FlexiArm. With it comes dirt detection, and between them the two additions decide how finished a room looks when the run ends. Both are about coverage, and neither touches the suction.
Everything underneath is shared with the cheaper Qrevo S. Laser navigation plans the route and keeps separate maps for several floors, while obstacle avoidance steers round clutter. A rubber brush vacuums and two spinning pads mop. The dock empties the bin, tops up the water, washes the pads in hot water and dries them afterwards. The pads unclip for a wash by hand, and the filter rinses clean under a tap.
What the Pro leaves alone is the platform's weaker side. Suction is modest, the pads rise enough for a thin rug and no more, and the battery gives out sooner than many rivals' do. The water tank on the robot is small too, although the dock refills it. The bin holds a little more than usual and the body is a fraction lower, neither by enough to sway a purchase. No HEPA filter is listed.
In the lineup, then, the Pro is the Qrevo for a home of hard floors where corners and kitchen spills are the daily annoyance and a thin rug or two can be fenced off from the mop in the app. A house with real carpet belongs one step higher, with the S8 MaxV Ultra and its taller mop lift. Both of the Pro's additions do their work on hard floor, the surface this platform was built to mop.
Category strengths
Where the Roborock Qrevo Pro beats the median
- A slightly bigger dustbin ?330 ml vs 300 ml (median)
Where the Roborock Qrevo Pro trails the median
- Much weaker suction ?7,000 Pa vs 19,750 Pa (median)
- A shorter runtime per charge ?150 min vs 194 min (median)
- A smaller water tank ?80 ml vs 110 ml (median)
- A lower threshold clearance ?19 mm vs 24 mm (median)
- A lower mop wash temperature ?60 °C vs 75 °C (median)
- A slightly lower warm-air drying temperature ?45 °C vs 50 °C (median)
- A slightly lower mop lift ?10 mm vs 10.5 mm (median)
How this VS Score was computed
Score 49: each known spec is measured against the median of all robot vacuums (58 products), then weighted; 50 means level with that median. In classes of six or more, a value beyond the class’s 10th–90th percentile range counts as that limit, so one extreme product cannot set the scale. 52% of the scoreable weight could be used; unknown values, features not applicable to this class and proxies (battery capacity where a rated life exists) add or remove nothing.
| Specification | This product | Cohort median | Score weight | Points moved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suction power | 7,000 | 19,750 | 1.2 | −38.4 |
| Mopping | Yes | 79% of the class have it | 0.6 | +30.0 |
| Edge-cleaning extension | Yes | 79% of the class have it | 0.4 | +20.0 |
| Dirt detection & re-mop | Yes | 79% of the class have it | 0.4 | +20.0 |
| HEPA filter | No | 29% of the class have it | 0.4 | −19.2 |
| Runtime | 150 | 194 | 0.8 | −8.8 |
| Water tank | 80 | 110 | 0.3 | −4.2 |
| Mop wash temperature | 60 | 75 | 0.3 | −3.0 |
| Threshold clearance | 19 — capped at the class’s lower range (20) | 24 | 0.3 | −2.4 |
| Dustbin capacity | 330 | 300 | 0.4 | +2.0 |
| Warm-air drying temperature | 45 | 50 | 0.2 | −1.0 |
| Mop lift | 10 | 10.5 | 0.3 | −0.6 |
| Cleaning modes | 4 | 4 | 0.3 | +0.0 |
| Navigation | LiDAR | LiDAR | 1 | +0.0 |
| Multi-floor maps | 4 | 4 | 0.4 | +0.0 |
| Battery capacity | 5,200 | 5,200 | 0.5 | +0.0 |
| Height | 96.5 | 96.8 | 0.5 | +0.0 |
Not scored: Carpet detection (standard for the class (98% have it)); Max cleaning area (unknown: not scored); Mapping (standard for the class (98% have it)); Obstacle avoidance (standard for the class (100% have it)); No-go zones (standard for the class (100% have it)); Recharge & resume (standard for the class (95% have it)); Self-empty dock (standard for the class (91% have it)); Auto-refill mop (standard for the class (87% have it)); Mop self-cleaning (standard for the class (92% have it)); Automatic mop removal (unknown: not scored); Automatic detergent dispenser (unknown: not scored); Noise level (unknown: not scored); App control (standard for the class (100% have it)); Voice assistant (standard for the class (100% have it)); Scheduling (standard for the class (100% have it)); Zone / room cleaning (standard for the class (100% have it)); Washable filter (standard for the class (88% have it)); Anti-tangle brush (standard for the class (98% have it)); Removable mop pads (standard for the class (90% have it)).
Editor’s note
The Qrevo Pro is the version of the Qrevo worth paying for, and the two features it adds over the Qrevo S are both about coverage.
The first is an extending edge arm. A round robot cannot reach into a corner, so a swing-out brush is the only way to sweep debris out of the angle and into the machine's path. Rooms cleaned without one keep a faint dust outline at the baseboards. The second is dirt detection: the machine notices when an area comes up dirty and mops it again rather than moving on, which is the difference between a pass and a clean on a kitchen floor.
Otherwise it shares the platform: LiDAR navigation with obstacle avoidance, four saved floor maps, 7,000 Pa of suction through a DuoRoller rubber brush, dual spinning mop pads with a 10 mm lift, a dock that empties, refills and washes, 150 minutes in balanced mode from a 5,200 mAh battery, and a 330 ml bin with an 80 ml tank. Pads are removable and the filter washable.
That mop lift clears a thin rug and not medium-pile carpet, and at 96.5 mm tall it is stopped by low furniture. No HEPA filter is listed.
Buy it over the Qrevo S if corners and repeat-mopping matter. For most homes they do, and the price gap is small. Step up to the S8 MaxV Ultra only if you have real carpet to lift over.
Specifications
Quality bars show where each figure sits between the lowest and highest of the 58 robot vacuums this VS Score is measured against.
Cleaning
Navigation
Battery & dock
Design
Smart features
Maintenance & filtration
Sources and verification
Where the specifications come from
- Official product pageus.roborock.com
- Independent testingrtings.com
Verification
- First published
- Specifications last checked
- Sheet completeness
- 34 of 39 specifications verified; the rest show as Unknown and are never estimated or scored
- Page type
- Product specification page — Compiled from the manufacturer’s published specifications and the cited sources; this is not a hands-on test.
- Basis
- Research-based: specifications and editorial text were compiled from the documents listed here and the manufacturer’s published data. We have not tested this unit ourselves; where independent measurements are mentioned they belong to the linked publication.
Where to buy
Prices and availability may change. Check the retailer before buying. We may earn a commission on purchases.
Price history
Robot Vacuums with similar specs to the Roborock Qrevo Pro
Ratings & reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.
The bottom line
The Roborock Qrevo Pro earns a VS Score of 49, below the median of the 58 robot vacuums it is measured against (a score of 50 is level with that median).
- Who it’s for
- Most hard-floored homes that want Roborock's platform with corners swept and dirty patches mopped twice, on one floor or several.
- Who should look elsewhere
- Medium-pile carpet, low furniture and heavy pet hair all call for a different machine.
- The trade-off that matters
- Modest suction and lift. The mop clears a thin rug and nothing thicker, so carpeted rooms have to be kept out of mopping runs in the app.
- The main alternative
- Roborock S8 MaxV Ultra: the higher mop lift a home of mixed carpet and hard floor needs
The VS Score is calculated from the weighted specifications above, each measured against the median of comparable robot vacuums — a shortlisting guide, not a substitute for your own priorities. See how we score.
