49PointsLG 27GX704A-B

LG 27GX704A-B: Specs, Features, Pros & Cons

Refresh rate has quietly become the specification people overbuy. The panels at the top of the range advertise numbers that need a graphics card at the top of its own range before the difference is visible at all. This LG sits deliberately below that ceiling, and the restraint is the most sensible thing about it.

At this size and resolution, the frame rates on offer are ones a mid-range machine can produce in the games where fast motion matters, and that is what turns a number into an experience. Buying more headroom than your hardware can fill leaves you with a monitor that spends its life running at the same speed as a cheaper one.

The panel technology is the second thing worth understanding before choosing. Two kinds of OLED are on shelves at the moment, and they differ in how they make light and how they arrange their subpixels, which affects highlight punch on one hand and the rendering of small text on the other. This is the variety that leans towards brightness and towards conventional text, which makes it a better candidate than most for a screen that has to do some work between games.

What it will not do is dock a laptop. There is a hub for peripherals, the stand moves in every direction, and video arrives from a tower or a console. If a work machine shares the desk, that is the gap to plan around.

For most people upgrading from an older gaming panel, this is roughly the point on the curve where more money stops buying anything you will notice.

LG 27GX704A-B

Category strengths

PictureGamingErgonomics& designConnectivity
49VS Score

Where the LG 27GX704A-B beats the median

  • Higher peak brightness ?1,300 nits vs 1,000 nits (median)
How this VS Score was computed

Score 49: each known spec is measured against the median of OLED gaming monitors, 27 to 31 inches (16 products), then weighted; 50 means level with that median. In classes of six or more, a value beyond the class’s 10th–90th percentile range counts as that limit, so one extreme product cannot set the scale. 70% of the scoreable weight could be used; unknown values, features not applicable to this class and proxies (battery capacity where a rated life exists) add or remove nothing.

SpecificationThis productCohort medianScore weightPoints moved
USB-CNo33% of the class have it0.5−24.0
Motion blur reductionNo22% of the class have it0.3−14.4
Peak brightness1,3001,0000.8+12.0
Headphone outputYes75% of the class have it0.2+10.0
USB hubYes73% of the class have it0.05+2.3
Screen size27271.2+0.0
Resolution1440p1440p1.2+0.0
Panel typeOLEDOLED0.8+0.0
Color depth10100.3+0.0
Refresh rate2402401.2+0.0
Response time0.030.030.8+0.0
Contrast ratio1,500,0001,500,0000.6+0.0
DCI-P3 coverage98.5 — capped at the class’s lower range (99)990.6+0.0
HDRTrue Black 400True Black 4000.5+0.0
Pixel density1101110.5+0.0
Adaptive syncG-Sync CompatibleG-Sync Compatible0.6+0.0
HDMI ports220.4+0.0
DisplayPort inputs110.4+0.0

Not scored: Local dimming (not applicable: only 0% of this class have it); Local dimming zones (unknown: not scored); Variable refresh rate (standard for the class (100% have it)); Input lag (unknown: not scored); Height adjustment (standard for the class (94% have it)); Tilt (standard for the class (100% have it)); Swivel (standard for the class (88% have it)); Pivot (standard for the class (81% have it)); USB-C power delivery (unknown: not scored); Built-in speakers (not applicable: only 0% of this class have it); KVM switch (unknown: not scored); Webcam (unknown: not scored); Microphone (unknown: not scored); Ethernet (unknown: not scored); Picture-by-picture (unknown: not scored).

Editor’s note

The 27GX704A is a WOLED rather than a QD-OLED, and on this specification that distinction works in its favor.

The headline is brightness: 1,300 nits peak, against the 1,000 the QD-OLED panels around it reach. On an OLED that is the number that has always been in short supply, so HDR highlights here have more force than the contrast figures alone would suggest. Quoted contrast is 1,500,000:1 with 98.5% DCI-P3 coverage.

Refresh is 240 Hz at 1440p with 0.03 ms response and G-Sync Compatible variable refresh. That is a step below the 360 Hz panels but far easier to feed, and past the point of diminishing returns outside competitive play. Pixel density is 110 ppi, so this is a gaming display rather than a text one.

WOLED's other characteristic is worth knowing. Its subpixel layout renders small text more conventionally than QD-OLED's triangular arrangement, which can produce less color fringing on thin fonts, a real if subtle advantage if the monitor doubles as a work screen.

Two HDMI 2.1 ports, DisplayPort 1.4 and a USB hub cover connections. There is no USB-C. The stand adjusts fully including pivot, and the coating is glossy.

Buy it if you want the brightest 1440p OLED and that refresh rate is fast enough for your games. Buy one of the faster panels only if you play competitively at frame rates your hardware can reach.

Specifications

Quality bars show where each figure sits between the lowest and highest of the 16 OLED gaming monitors, 27 to 31 inches this VS Score is measured against.

Picture

Screen size ?
27″ (68.58 cm)
Resolution ?
1440p
Panel type ?
OLED
Panel subtype ?
WOLED
Color depth ?
10 bit
Screen coating ?
Glossy
Refresh rate ?
240 Hz
Response time ?
0.03 ms
Peak brightness ?
1,300 nits
Contrast ratio ?
1500000:1
DCI-P3 coverage ?
98.5 %
sRGB coverage ?
? Unknown
HDR ?
True Black 400
Pixel density ?
110 ppi
Local dimming ?
✗No
Local dimming zones ?
? Unknown

Gaming

Adaptive sync ?
G-Sync Compatible
Variable refresh rate ?
✓Yes
Motion blur reduction ?
✗No
Input lag ?
? Unknown
VRR range ?
? Unknown

Ergonomics & design

Aspect ratio ?
16:9
Curvature ?
Flat
Height adjustment ?
✓Yes
Tilt ?
✓Yes
Swivel ?
✓Yes
Pivot ?
✓Yes
VESA mount ?
100 x 100 mm

Connectivity

HDMI ports ?
2
HDMI version ?
2.1
DisplayPort inputs ?
1
DisplayPort version ?
1.4
USB-C ?
✗No
USB-C power delivery ?
? Unknown
USB hub ?
✓Yes
Built-in speakers ?
✗No
Headphone output ?
✓Yes
KVM switch ?
? Unknown

Features

Webcam ?
? Unknown
Microphone ?
? Unknown
Ethernet ?
? Unknown
Picture-by-picture ?
? Unknown

Sources and verification

Where the specifications come from

Verification

First published
Specifications last checked
Sheet completeness
32 of 42 specifications verified; the rest show as Unknown and are never estimated or scored
Page type
Product specification page — Compiled from the manufacturer’s published specifications and the cited sources; this is not a hands-on test.
Basis
Research-based: specifications and editorial text were compiled from the documents listed here and the manufacturer’s published data. We have not tested this unit ourselves; where independent measurements are mentioned they belong to the linked publication.

Monitors with similar specs to the LG 27GX704A-B

Ratings & reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.

Write a review

Sign in to write a verified review:

The bottom line

The LG 27GX704A-B earns a VS Score of 49, below the median of the 16 OLED gaming monitors, 27 to 31 inches it is measured against (a score of 50 is level with that median).

Who it’s for
Someone upgrading an older gaming panel with a mid-range PC, who wants bright OLED highlights and a screen that copes with text between games.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone whose work laptop shares the desk and expects one-cable docking, and competitive players who can push frame rates well beyond this ceiling.
The trade-off that matters
It stops below the fastest refresh rates in exchange for a brighter panel that a mid-range card can fill, which suits most players and leaves esports specialists wanting more.
The main alternative
ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG: an even brighter tandem panel at a higher refresh ceiling, for players whose card can reach it.

The VS Score is calculated from the weighted specifications above, each measured against the median of comparable OLED gaming monitors, 27 to 31 inches — a shortlisting guide, not a substitute for your own priorities. See how we score.

Latest Monitors