34 facts in comparison
AULA F99 vs Wooting 60HE v2
This comparison puts the AULA F99 and Wooting 60HE v2 side by side — two keyboards measured against the same 34-spec sheet, with every meaningful gap scored and explained. On our weighted VS Score the Wooting 60HE v2 finishes ahead, 84 to 64 — a decisive result.
The single biggest measurable gap is switch technology: Mechanical vs Hall effect. None of our retail partners currently lists the Wooting 60HE v2, so availability may be limited and price cannot factor into this comparison. A transparency note before you dive in: the spec sheets are AULA F99 91% and Wooting 60HE v2 85% complete. Anything unverified shows as Unknown and is left out of the scores — we never estimate a missing value.
Where the AULA F99 beats the Wooting 60HE v2
- Has 2.4 GHz wireless, Bluetooth ?
- Has media controls ?
- Has rotary knob ?
Where the Wooting 60HE v2 beats the AULA F99
- Hall effect Switch technology ?Hall effect vs Mechanical
- Has adjustable actuation ?
- Has analog input ?
- 7,000 Hz more polling rate ?8,000 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
- Has rapid trigger ?
- 13.7 mm less front height ?28.6 mm vs 42.3 mm
Key real-world differences
The spec sheet pulls in both directions. These are the gaps big enough to shape the decision — with the actual figures, and what each one means in real-world use.
- Switch technologySwitches & typingMechanical vs Hall effect — advantage Wooting 60HE v2
The key switch technology; later types are generally more responsive.
- Polling ratePerformance1,000 Hz vs 8,000 Hz — 8× more for the Wooting 60HE v2
How often the keyboard reports input; higher can reduce latency.
- ConnectionConnectivityWired, 2.4 GHz wireless, Bluetooth vs Wired — advantage AULA F99
The supported connection types.
- Rapid triggerPerformanceNo vs Yes — only the Wooting 60HE v2 has it
Resets a key dynamically as it moves, enabling faster repeated inputs.
- Adjustable actuationSwitches & typingNo vs Yes — only the Wooting 60HE v2 has it
Set the actuation point per key (analog / Hall-effect boards).
Which one should you buy?
There is no single answer — it depends on what you will actually use it for. Match your priority to the pick below.
- Best for switches & typing Wooting 60HE v2 takes the category 100 to 38 — driven by switch technology (Mechanical vs Hall effect).
- Best for performance Wooting 60HE v2 takes the category 100 to 0 — driven by polling rate (1,000 Hz vs 8,000 Hz).
- Best for connectivity AULA F99 takes the category 100 to 20 — driven by connection (Wired, 2.4 GHz wireless, Bluetooth vs Wired).
- Best for features AULA F99 takes the category 100 to 64 — driven by media controls (Yes vs No).
- Best for layout & size Wooting 60HE v2 takes the category 100 to 0 — driven by front height (42.3 mm vs 28.6 mm).
- The safe all-rounder Wooting 60HE v2 wins more of the categories that carry real weight, topping the overall VS Score at 84.
Where each one falls short
AULA F99
- Switch technology: Mechanical vs Hall effect
- Polling rate: 1,000 Hz vs 8,000 Hz
- Rapid trigger: No vs Yes
- 3 specs are unreported (shown as Unknown) and excluded from its scores.
Wooting 60HE v2
- Connection: Wired, 2.4 GHz wireless, Bluetooth vs Wired
- Media controls: Yes vs No
- Rotary knob: Yes vs No
- 5 specs are unreported (shown as Unknown) and excluded from its scores.
What matters to you?
Drag the sliders to weight each category and re-rank the products to suit your priorities.
Score breakdown
How the VS Score works — and what it can’t tell you
Every measurable spec is scored relative to this matchup: the best value here earns 100%, the worst 0%, and everything between scales linearly. Each spec then counts according to an editorial weight that reflects real-world impact — a battery-capacity gap moves the score far more than a colour-options list. The category scores above are the weighted results inside each group, and the overall VS Score rolls all of them together; the evidence line under each category names the specs that actually decided it.
Unknown values are never estimated. A spec a product doesn’t report simply drops out of that product’s scoring — it isn’t penalised with a guess — and a spec only one side reports can never produce a “win”. The trade-off is honest but real: a thinner spec sheet means a score built on fewer data points, which is why the completeness figures are disclosed under About this data.
Most importantly: a spec-sheet lead is not the same as a better product. Megapixels, gigahertz and benchmark points describe capacity, not experience — image processing, software optimisation, thermals, haptics and ergonomics decide how a device actually feels, and no table captures reliability or long-term support quality. Treat the scores as a structured summary of what can be measured, read the caveats under each key difference, and use the weight tuner to re-rank the comparison by what matters to you.
Switches & typing
The key switch technology; later types are generally more responsive.
The specific switch used (e.g. Cherry MX Red).
The force needed to register a key; lower is lighter to type on.
Swap switches without soldering.
Registers every simultaneous keypress.
Set the actuation point per key (analog / Hall-effect boards).
Keys report their travel depth for variable gamepad-style input and multi-stage actions.
Performance
How often the keyboard reports input; higher can reduce latency.
End-to-end keypress latency over a wired connection; lower is better.
End-to-end keypress latency over the fastest wireless mode; lower is better.
Resets a key dynamically as it moves, enabling faster repeated inputs.
Layout & size
The keyboard size and layout.
The number of keys.
The overall width.
The overall depth.
The front case height without keycaps; lower boards can reduce wrist extension.
The keyboard's weight.
Connectivity
The supported connection types.
How many paired devices it can switch between.
Battery life for wireless models.
The rated capacity of the internal battery.
A built-in USB port for other devices.
Build & sound
Keycap plastic; PBT resists shine and wear better than ABS.
The case material (e.g. aluminium, ABS plastic).
The switch plate material, which influences stiffness and typing sound.
How larger keys are stabilised (e.g. screw-in PCB or plate-mounted).
The plate / PCB mounting style (e.g. gasket mount).
Internal foam or dampening for a quieter, fuller sound.
The per-key lighting.
Features
Remap keys and record macros.
Dedicated volume and playback controls.
A control knob for volume or custom actions.
Stores layouts on the board itself.
Companion configuration software (e.g. VIA / QMK).
About this data
- Specifications are compiled from each manufacturer’s official spec sheet, cross-checked against trusted specification databases, and normalised into one schema so identical things are compared identically.
- Specifications last verified August 1, 2026.
- Data completeness: AULA F99 91% and Wooting 60HE v2 85% of the 34 specs in this category. Anything we could not verify is shown as Unknown — never estimated — and is excluded from all scores.
- Prices and availability come from live retailer feeds via our shopping partners and refresh throughout the day; a missing price means no partner currently lists the product, not that it is discontinued.
- Want the full picture? Our editorial guidelines explain how we research products, weight the scores and stay independent.
- Spotted an error in a spec? Tell us and we will correct the sheet.
Where to buy
No price is available to track yet.
Prices and availability may change. Check the retailer before buying. We may earn a commission on purchases.
What reviewers say
The bottom line
The Wooting 60HE v2 is the clear winner, scoring 84 to 64 on our VS Score. It leads on Switches & typing, Performance and Layout & size. The AULA F99 answers back with stronger Connectivity and Features. Pick the Wooting 60HE v2 unless Connectivity and Features matters most to you — then the AULA F99 is the smarter buy.
